The term ?disassociation? applies to the action taken by a person who, although a baptized member of the congregation, deliberately repudiates his Christian standing, rejecting the congregation by his actions or by stating that he no longer wants to be recognized as on of Jehovah?s Witnesses.
Correct me if I am wrong [and I did not get to read all the posts - sorry]. But is this not a slightly differing stance on Disassociation? Could the term 'deliberately repudiates' be a new one - with a lot of shades of opportunity to attack those who have no chance to defend themselves - as they might if they were charged with 'disturbing the peace or unity of the congregation'?
Since I have distanced myself from the org. - could they state that I have repudiated the organization since I have no reason not to go [as far as they know], and have had issues with the elders lording it over?
Just seems like the wording might give them openings that they did not feel as free to exploit before. Perhaps the 'shades' of meaning are hidden in a BOE somewhere.
Thoughts?
Jeff